JulianB1
Well-Known Member
So today I see a Facebook post about a new brewery that's opening soon and I'm thinking "oh cool, this place sounds interesting, the logo is nice, etc." and I see (in the same post) that they are already selling memberships to some sort of reserve society. This for a brewery that hasn't even opened yet, and whose website is "coming soon". I don't want to name the brewery because this is not an attempt to pick on them, but is any of this starting to rub people the wrong way? Of course, the most extreme example might be from that thread the other week with the Belgium trip kickstarter offering memberships to some future reserve society for a brewery that doesn't even exist.
There's obviously a ton of these already in existence and more popping up seemingly every month; the following list compiled by users here is a good starting point but I suspect already a bit out of date:
http://www.talkbeer.com/community/threads/brewery-society-roundup.1842/
I'm not against this idea in general, especially when it's done well. And I'll proudly admit to having a De Garde Keeper's Society membership; I support the brewery, degardebrewing's vision for his beers and the future, and most importantly I have really enjoyed their beers. But I wouldn't have bought a membership without having visited the brewery and having had a great day trying and loving the beers. De Garde wasn't selling society memberships before they were selling tasting room pours like some breweries now seem to be doing. I think at a bare minimum, before offering these kinds of memberships, the brewery in question should be up-and-running and consistently producing beer that meets their own personal quality standards, which are available for public consumption. So no selling memberships to a brewery that isn't even running on its main equipment based on having poured some test batches brewed off a homebrew system. I feel like too many startups now are jumping on this train as a way to get some quick cash and build up hype, since it's what a lot of the "cool kids" (Crooked Stave, Bruery, Hill Farmstead, etc.) are doing. Thoughts?
There's obviously a ton of these already in existence and more popping up seemingly every month; the following list compiled by users here is a good starting point but I suspect already a bit out of date:
http://www.talkbeer.com/community/threads/brewery-society-roundup.1842/
I'm not against this idea in general, especially when it's done well. And I'll proudly admit to having a De Garde Keeper's Society membership; I support the brewery, degardebrewing's vision for his beers and the future, and most importantly I have really enjoyed their beers. But I wouldn't have bought a membership without having visited the brewery and having had a great day trying and loving the beers. De Garde wasn't selling society memberships before they were selling tasting room pours like some breweries now seem to be doing. I think at a bare minimum, before offering these kinds of memberships, the brewery in question should be up-and-running and consistently producing beer that meets their own personal quality standards, which are available for public consumption. So no selling memberships to a brewery that isn't even running on its main equipment based on having poured some test batches brewed off a homebrew system. I feel like too many startups now are jumping on this train as a way to get some quick cash and build up hype, since it's what a lot of the "cool kids" (Crooked Stave, Bruery, Hill Farmstead, etc.) are doing. Thoughts?