jedwards can attest I have pestered him numerous times with random questions revolving around bottle dating of different De Dolle offerings.
However, what sparked me to create this thread is a number of rumors/here-say and what I believe to be general misinformation that ive come across in reading various forums. (All regarding the mad ***** in 750ml bottles.)
The 750ml seem to be circa 2004ish or older. Was this really just the brewer using whatever bottles he had access to? Is the 750ml contents the same as the smaller format? Is it possible that the perceived taste differences are merely large formats aging better than smaller? Via ratebeer, someone suggested a completely different beer "reserva" though it was not marked as such on the bottle.
On BA I saw claaark13 chime in with some tasting notes/commentary, which maybe im recalling this incorrectly, lead me to lean toward my notion that it might be storage based variations and not so much as a different brew in the large format bottles.
It has been years since ive had one of these large format mad bitches so my opinion on the matter is void. I remember it coming from a source that did not have ideal storage conditions, label almost completely gone and the taste was heavily oxidized to the point of it not being recognizable as mad *****. At this same tasting a bottle of 16 year old rose de Gambrinus was also opened (same storage) and that was a funktified mess that I also thought was possibly a victim of storage conditions.
However, what sparked me to create this thread is a number of rumors/here-say and what I believe to be general misinformation that ive come across in reading various forums. (All regarding the mad ***** in 750ml bottles.)
The 750ml seem to be circa 2004ish or older. Was this really just the brewer using whatever bottles he had access to? Is the 750ml contents the same as the smaller format? Is it possible that the perceived taste differences are merely large formats aging better than smaller? Via ratebeer, someone suggested a completely different beer "reserva" though it was not marked as such on the bottle.
On BA I saw claaark13 chime in with some tasting notes/commentary, which maybe im recalling this incorrectly, lead me to lean toward my notion that it might be storage based variations and not so much as a different brew in the large format bottles.
It has been years since ive had one of these large format mad bitches so my opinion on the matter is void. I remember it coming from a source that did not have ideal storage conditions, label almost completely gone and the taste was heavily oxidized to the point of it not being recognizable as mad *****. At this same tasting a bottle of 16 year old rose de Gambrinus was also opened (same storage) and that was a funktified mess that I also thought was possibly a victim of storage conditions.